What Was the Vikings' Greatest Weapon?
by Sons Of Vikings Sat, Sep 16, 17In the early ninth century, the Vikings tore through Europe, wreaking havoc and consuming territory at a level that filled their victims with awe and dread. But why were the wealthier, more populous, and entrenched peoples of what are now England, Ireland, France, and Russia so powerless to stop them? What made these Norsemen so effective?
It was actually none of these things. These weapons were formidable, but the natives of the lands the Vikings invaded had similar swords, shields, axes, and spears. Their armor of chain mail, scales, leather, quilted jackets, or animal furs (which was not just a convention in B-rate movies, but an inexpensive and practical way to separate a man from the edge of a sword) was also similar between the Norsemen and their Saxon, Frankish, or Celtic enemies. If we could travel back in time and see the two sides meet on the mist-shrouded knoll, we would probably at first have difficulty telling them apart. So it was not the warrior’s kit, or the tools of war that made the Vikings nearly invincible.
We know from archaeological records as well as from the tales their foes told of them, that the Vikings were some of the biggest men in Europe at the time. The average Viking would be muscular and supremely well-conditioned not only from a lifetime of weapons practice, but from long bouts of rowing their long ships through open seas.
Yet, while anyone who fights will tell you that size matters, it is also true that size isn’t everything. While the extra twenty pounds of brawn a Norseman or Dane would bring to the shield wall was a considerable advantage, this advantage could be negated through superior numbers of their enemies, or other means. Centuries before, the Romans proved that the physical stature of Germanic peoples could not only be overcome, but even used against them. Of course, many of the Saxon and Frankish warriors the Vikings faced were also big men with a lifetime of warcraft.
However, the Vikings did not always need their long ships to be effective. In fact, the “Great Heathen Army” of 865 left their ships behind them and advanced through the kingdoms of England on foot or on horseback. They were just as successful, and managed to seize the entire eastern part of the island for themselves (Churchill, 1956; Brown, 2015). So while the long ship was one of the things that launched the Norsemen’s supremacy, it was not the sole cause of it.
History is often the tale of “perfect storms”, and this is certainly true of the Viking Age. The profound psychological advantage of the Scandinavian adventurers was made even more powerful by the contrasting mindset of their enemies. The early medieval Christian mind was especially literal. The people who lived in the lands the Vikings plundered expected God to be actively involved in their world, and to reward every good behavior and punish every bad one. For evidence of this mindset we need look no further than the laws of time: trials by ordeal and trials by combat were the norm. So when the Vikings began ravaging the lands of Christian Europe, many of the defenders believed that (just like in the Old Testament when the Israelites were punished by losses in battle) God was using the Vikings to punish them for some unknown sin (Flood, 2013). So with every victory, the Vikings became more confident, and with every defeat, the defenders became more certain that their cause was hopeless.
Eventually, the Christian defenders did begin to gain victories, and under strong leadership and innovations of their own they began to turn back the Viking tide. Gradually, the Vikings began converting to Christianity; but they did not immediately abandon the spiritual dimensions of their warlike nature. One of the most celebrated Vikings of all time was Herald Hardrada, a Christian Varangian long in Byzantine service, and the self-made king of Norway. In the songs and sagas celebrating Herald’s amazing valor combined with appalling violence and rapine, we see the poets reflecting the mindset of the day by sharing this glory (rather perversely) with Christ rather than Odin (Howarth, 1977).
Herald Hardrada’s glorious death in battle marked the end of Viking Age in 1066; but part of his legacy is the demonstration that while beliefs and ways of life change over time, the Viking ethos of unshakable valor remains the greatest of weapons.
Contributing Author:
References:
Brown, N.M. (2015), Ivory Vikings: the Mystery of the Most Famous Chessmen in the World and the Woman Who Made Them, St Martin’s Press, New York, NY
Churchill, W. S. (1956), A History of the English Speaking Peoples, volume 1: The Birth of Britain, Barnes and Noble Books, USA
Flood, J. (2013), The Twilight of the North: From Byzantium to Stamford Bridge, Kindle Direct Publishing, USA
Howarth, D. (1977), 1066: The Year of the Conquest, Penguin Books Ltd., London